information architecture & critical history of software (PhD research) in Toronto

view my cv

Quinn DuPont studies the critical history of software technologies, focusing on metaphysical, historical, and political issues. He has recently been studying the history of email and developing an argument about the modes of production for software development. Quinn is currently a MITACS Enhanced Accelerate PhD Fellow and iSchool PhD student in Toronto, Canada.

search
reading
  • Difference and Repetition
    Difference and Repetition
    by Gilles Deleuze
  • From Taylorism to Fordism: A Rational Madness
    From Taylorism to Fordism: A Rational Madness
    by Bernard Doray
  • Questioning Technology
    Questioning Technology
    by Andrew Feenberg
« Review of Building Enterprise Taxonomies | Main | Chp. 8: Ongoing review of Building Enterprise Taxonomies by Darin L. Stewart »
Sunday
Oct192008

Chp. 9: Ongoing review of Building Enterprise Taxonomies by Darin L. Stewart

The final chapter of Stewart’s Building Enterprise Taxonomies is (comedically) about the red-headed step-child of information architecture, folksonomies. Stewart had already stated his opinion, perhaps somewhat implicitly, about the value of folksonomies vis-à-vis controlled taxonomies, that folksonomies are left to a final short chapter is confirmation of his opinion. Stewart does provide some helpful insight about the potential value of folksonomies, which is to say that, like everything, in the right situation a folksonomy can be a powerful tool. Prior to reading this chapter I had never heard of “desire lines” being associated with folksonomies, but it’s actually a brilliant way to conceptualize the workings of a folksonomy. As Stewart explains, desire lines are the paths that human predilection establishes, such as viewed by the dirt paths through grassy fields rounding out sidewalk corners. The brilliance here is that folksonomies are best used in situations where desire plays a large part, so, libraries, enterprises, and the like are not a good choice, but sexy social websites that have a large and committed audience are a great place to use folksonomies.